home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!burst.demon.co.uk
- From: Lee@burst.demon.co.uk (Lee Huggett)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
- Subject: Re: 80 MIPS with Blizzard1260?
- Date: Mon, 26 Feb 1996 19:28:15 GMT
- Message-ID: <822.6630T1154T524@burst.demon.co.uk>
- References: <734.6617T840T985@Th0r.foo.bar> <38232626@kone.fipnet.fi> <xMPsuMD0aRz1@point86.people-s.people.de>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: burst.demon.co.uk
- X-NNTP-Posting-Host: burst.demon.co.uk
- X-Newsreader: THOR 2.22 (Amiga;TCP/IP) *UNREGISTERED*
-
- > Reply to Re: 80 MIPS with Blizzard1260? / 23.02.1996
- > by jsaarinen@kone.fipnet.fi (Jyrki Saarinen)
- JS>> > If you read an earlier message you will see that the 80 MIPS speedtest
- JS>> > was achived by only executing NOP's.
-
- > By only executing NOPS you won`t reach 80 MIPS by any chance, because
- > NOPS are really slow in 68060 since they fluch the pipeline..
-
- JS>> Bullshit. A 68060/50 can achieve up to 100 MIPS with real-life
- JS>> code, execute two one-cycle instructions at a time. (move / add etc.)
-
- Yeah maybe you can but how much '060 optimised code is there around
-
- Lee
-
- ****************************************
- * Republico Presente CHANNEL NINE!!!! *
- * Bueno Estente.. Butros Butros Ghali *
- ****************************************
- Lee Huggett lee@burst.demon.co.uk
- c9251123@zeus.hud.ac.uk
-
-